Free AI audit

Find the fastest AI, SEO, or automation fix for your business.

Halo reviews the buyer journey from search result to enquiry and recommends the smallest useful build first: SEO/AEO content, lead capture, AI receptionist coverage, or automation that removes manual drag.

Audit input

Send one live surface and the symptom you can already see.

The free audit is strongest when it starts with one reviewable page, route, or workflow and one commercial leak. That lets Halo return a useful first slice instead of a broad AI wishlist.

Surface
The service page, enquiry form, missed-call route, inbox step, or admin workflow Halo should inspect.
Symptom
The visible issue: unclear answers, soft enquiries, slow replies, missed calls, or repeated manual follow-up.
Proof
The before-and-after signal that would make the first fix worth approving or expanding.

What the first pass covers

Built to choose the next useful improvement.

Each recommendation is designed to be source-ready, measurable, and reversible before larger retainers or live deployment decisions.

Included

  • Priority visibility or conversion gap
  • One practical automation opportunity
  • Plain-English next implementation step
Review the AI growth guides

Before you send

The audit only needs enough context to choose one first slice.

This keeps the form lightweight while still making the first recommendation specific, measurable, and safe to review.

Minimum useful input
One public URL, service page, form path, missed-call route, or admin workflow that should produce more value.
Helpful proof
A short note on the enquiry you want more of, where buyers drop off, or what manual follow-up slows the team down.
Leave out for now
Passwords, analytics access, customer records, account invites, and broad AI roadmap ideas that would dilute the first fix.

After the form

The reply should make one decision easier.

The free audit path now sets a tighter post-submit expectation before the buyer reaches the form: Halo will return a short decision note that names the bottleneck, the first slice, and the signal to check.

  1. 01Primary bottleneck

    Visibility, capture, response, or admin, chosen from the submitted page, route, or workflow.

  2. 02First useful slice

    A bounded implementation recommendation that can be approved, built, and verified before a broader AI roadmap.

  3. 03Proof boundary

    The before-and-after signal to watch, plus any account, deploy, or customer-data action that still needs explicit sign-off.

Approval map

Choose how ready you are before Halo recommends a first slice.

The form now asks for approval authority, but this map makes the choice plain before submission so the audit reply can stay inside the right boundary.

Review only
Halo returns the bottleneck, first-slice recommendation, risk notes, and proof signal without assuming any implementation approval.
Source-ready slice
Halo can shape the recommendation as a buildable website, content, funnel, or workflow change for review before anything goes live.
Publish after proof
Halo still names the live-change boundary first: publishing, tracking, tool connections, and customer-facing workflow changes wait for explicit sign-off.

Response timing

Expect a focused written reply before a sales call.

The audit route now tells buyers what happens after submission: Halo reads the public context first, then replies with one decision note instead of pushing straight to a broad consultation.

Normal reply
A focused written recommendation after Halo reviews the submitted URL, route, proof signal, and approval position.
If the queue is busy
The request still lands as a written audit note, so the first bottleneck and next useful slice are not lost.
Before paid work
Halo names the first implementation slice, proof signal, risk notes, and approval boundary before a proposal or sprint expands.

Evidence pack

Bring the three facts that make the first recommendation sharper.

The form should feel light, but the recommendation improves when the buyer can name the surface, the symptom, and the proof signal before submitting.

01

Surface to inspect

Public URL, form path, missed-call route, redacted screenshot, or admin workflow note.

02

Commercial symptom

Weak enquiries, unclear answer, slow reply, missed call, repeated admin, or low-confidence CTA.

03

Proof signal

The after-check that would make the first slice worth approving: visibility, capture, response, or owner time.

Use These In The Form

Audit form

Send the page, route, or workflow Halo should inspect first.

This keeps the audit request on the website and asks for the same context Halo needs to return one practical first-slice recommendation.

Abstract workflow visual for a focused Halo audit request
Best input
One URL, form path, missed-call route, or admin workflow.
Useful detail
The enquiry, reply, visibility, or manual follow-up problem buyers or the owner can already feel.
01Send the surface

URL, form path, call route, or workflow.

02Name the leak

Visibility, capture, response, or admin.

03Get one first slice

Recommendation, proof signal, and next action.

Best requests include a live URL or workflow, the commercial symptom, and the proof signal that would make the first fix worth shipping.

2-3 minute request

Use short answers. Choose the review surface, proof signal, and approval boundary.

Your reply will cover
  • Surface

    The page, form path, missed-call route, or workflow Halo inspected.

  • Bottleneck

    Whether visibility, capture, response, or admin is the first useful constraint.

  • First slice

    The smallest website, content, funnel, or workflow change worth approving.

  • Proof signal

    The before-and-after check and any approval boundary before live change.

Use this format if you are stuck

Review this page or workflow: [link]. The leak I can see is: [weak enquiries, slow replies, missed calls, unclear answer, or manual follow-up]. A useful first fix would prove: [better enquiry quality, faster response, clearer visibility, or less owner admin].

Before you submit
  • Share a public URL, redacted screenshot, or workflow note.
  • Keep passwords, customer records, and account invites out of the request.
  • Name the one decision Halo should make first.
Proof examples
  • Visibility: the service answer is clearer in the page title, first paragraph, FAQ, and schema.
  • Capture: the CTA path, form start, or qualified enquiry click is easier to compare.
  • Response/admin: the missed-call, follow-up, or repeated task route has fewer manual steps.

Keep this to one public surface, one visible symptom, and the proof signal that would make the first slice worth approving. 40-1200 characters.

What Halo sends back
Receipt
Primary bottleneck, closest revenue surface, and the first slice Halo would ship.
Timing
One focused written recommendation before any sales call or broader roadmap.
Approval
No publishing, tracking, account access, or customer-facing workflow change without explicit sign-off.
After you send it

Halo replies with the primary bottleneck, closest revenue surface, one first implementation slice, and the proof signal to check before any larger build.

If delivery queues, the request still lands as a written audit note instead of opening a mail app.

No mail app opens. The request is submitted through the onsite form.

Safe audit boundary

Send review context, not private access.

The free audit can start from public pages, screenshots, workflow notes, or a written symptom. It should not need passwords, customer records, account invites, or live-system changes before a first recommendation.

Good input
A public URL, form path, missed-call route description, admin workflow note, or redacted screenshot.
Keep out
Passwords, API keys, customer data, inbox access, analytics logins, or production account invitations.
Approval line
Any live-account connection, tracking change, publishing action, or customer-facing workflow change needs explicit sign-off after the audit.

Start with the right problem

Choose the audit route that matches the bottleneck.

Visitors should not have to translate a broad AI offer into their own situation. This triage section makes the next step feel specific before the form.

Visibility route

The right buyers are not finding or understanding the service.

Send the service page or target query. Halo checks answer clarity, entity signals, schema alignment, internal routes, and AI-search readability.

Best first output: one answer-ready page fix.

Prefill visibility audit

Conversion route

Traffic arrives, but the next step does not create enough enquiries.

Send the page, offer, form, or CTA path. Halo reviews hierarchy, proof, friction, mobile action clarity, and follow-up handoff.

Best first output: one sharper enquiry path.

Prefill conversion audit

Response route

Good leads cool because reply, triage, or admin is too slow.

Send the missed-call or enquiry workflow. Halo maps qualification, summary, routing, and the smallest useful automation handoff.

Best first output: one receptionist or triage route.

Prefill response audit

Admin route

Manual follow-up steals time after the enquiry lands.

Send the repeat admin step, handoff, spreadsheet, or inbox workflow. Halo checks what can be simplified before larger automation is approved.

Best first output: one repeatable admin handoff.

Prefill admin audit

Best use of the free audit

Use it when one buyer path should be working harder.

This sets a clearer expectation before the CTA: the audit is for a real page, service, enquiry route, or workflow that can be improved, not a generic AI brainstorming request.

Strong fit

You can point to one live friction point.

  • A service page should generate better qualified enquiries.
  • Calls, forms, or messages are not followed up fast enough.
  • A buyer question needs a clearer answer for Google and AI search.

Weak fit

The goal is still too broad to diagnose.

  • No page, route, offer, or workflow is ready to review.
  • The ask is only "use AI somewhere" with no business symptom.
  • There is no way to judge visibility, capture, response, or admin impact.

How the audit works

A clearer path from interest to first useful fix.

The audit page now explains what to send, what Halo checks, and what the buyer gets back, so the CTA does not feel like a vague contact form.

01

Send one URL or workflow

Start with the service page, enquiry route, missed-call problem, or admin process that should be producing more value.

02

Halo checks the buyer path

Visibility, answer clarity, CTA hierarchy, form friction, reply speed, schema, crawl context, and automation fit are reviewed together.

03

Get one practical next move

The output is a focused first implementation recommendation, not a broad AI roadmap or a retainer pitch.

What you get back

A short decision note, not a vague sales call.

The audit now sets a clearer expectation for the response, reducing uncertainty before the buyer opens the form CTA.

01

Primary bottleneck

The page, form, follow-up, or answer-engine gap most likely to affect qualified enquiries first.

02

First implementation slice

A small source-ready recommendation that can be built, checked, and reviewed before larger commitments.

03

Proof and risk notes

What to measure, what not to claim yet, and which deploy or account actions still need explicit approval.

Response expectation

Know what happens after the audit form.

This keeps the free audit grounded: Halo replies with one decision-ready note, then only scopes paid work if there is a concrete first slice worth shipping.

Reply format
Short written recommendation with the primary bottleneck, first fix, and measurement point.
Best next action
Approve one small visibility, capture, response, or admin improvement before expanding the AI roadmap.
Not included
No inflated traffic promise, generic AI strategy deck, or live-account change without explicit approval.

What to include

Make the audit useful in minutes.

Buyers should not need to prepare a long brief. These prompts make the first step low-friction while still giving Halo enough context to recommend the right slice.

Send this

  • Your website or target service page
  • The enquiry you want more of
  • Any missed-call, slow follow-up, or manual admin problem
  • The area you suspect is weak: SEO, AEO, CTA, form, or automation
Open the Audit Form

Form-ready brief

The audit CTA now opens with a useful brief.

The form route includes a structured prompt, so buyers are not dropped into a blank form and Halo gets the context needed for a sharper first recommendation.

Website or page to review:

The enquiry I want more of:

What feels weak right now: SEO / AEO / CTA / form / follow-up / missed calls / admin workflow

Any context that would help:

Open Audit Form

Common questions

Answers before the next step.

These visible answers match the page FAQ schema, keeping the buyer experience and answer-engine context aligned.

What should I send for the free AI audit?

Send one website, service page, enquiry route, missed-call problem, or manual workflow that should be producing more value. A short note about the enquiry you want more of is enough.

What does the audit return?

The audit returns the main bottleneck, one practical first implementation slice, and proof or risk notes so the next move is clear before paid work is scoped.

Is the audit a broad AI roadmap?

No. The audit is intentionally narrow: it chooses the fastest useful visibility, conversion, response, or admin improvement before larger AI work is considered.

Get Free AI Audit